Most controversial statements that shook nation this yr – India TV


Picture Supply : PTI (From left to proper) Rahul Gandhi, Arvind Kejriwal, Mamata Banerjee, and Sam Pitroda

The yr 2024 was marked by a collection of contentious remarks from political leaders and distinguished figures, every igniting intense debates throughout the nation. From allegations of undermining democratic establishments to feedback stirring communal or social discord, these statements dominated headlines and polarized public opinion.

Congress chief Rahul Gandhi stood a step away from a number of politically delicate remarks, however chief amongst them was his unpalatable “two varieties of troopers” line and misguided claims about non secular freedom for minorities in India. After which, after all, there have been the opposite figures comparable to Sam Pitroda and Sambit Patra, who acquired into the streets resulting from racially insensitive remarks or politically inciting them. And they might embody Mamata Banerjee, Arvind Kejriwal, Mayawati, and others.

These feedback will now stay because the yr’s finish approaches as a result of they concern themselves with what is mostly understood in India as a rhetoric in public discourse. Here is trying on the most controversial statements of 2024. These are the very phrases that triggered protests and debates for and towards them.

Rahul Gandhi’s ‘two varieties of troopers’ remark

Congress chief Rahul Gandhi created a significant controversy when he claimed that PM Modi had created “two varieties of troopers” in India. Based on Gandhi, one group comprised poor, Dalit, and minority troopers (recruited below the Agniveer scheme) who have been disadvantaged of advantages like pensions and canteen services, whereas troopers from wealthy households obtained all these privileges. His remark led to accusations of disrespecting the Indian Military, with the BJP lodging a proper grievance with the Election Fee.

Sam Pitroda’s inheritance tax comment

Sam Pitroda, former chairman of the Indian Abroad Congress, sparked outrage by advocating for the adoption of the inheritance tax system in India, just like the one in america. He advised that if an individual accumulates vital wealth, a big portion needs to be handed over to the federal government upon their demise. Many considered his remarks as controversial, criticizing them as an assault on wealth creators and the Indian financial system.

Sam Pitroda’s ‘Racist’ Touch upon Range

Pitroda additional attracted controversy together with his feedback about India’s ethnic range. He acknowledged that folks in South India “appear like Africans,” these within the East “appear like Chinese language,” and people within the West resemble Arabs. His remarks have been extensively condemned for his or her racial insensitivity and have been seen as perpetuating dangerous stereotypes about India’s various inhabitants.

Sambit Patra’s Lord Jagannath Comment

BJP chief Sambit Patra discovered himself in scorching water after claiming that Lord Jagannath was a “bhakt” (devotee) of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. His feedback have been made throughout Modi’s roadshow in Puri, Odisha. Patra’s comment was seen as a controversial try to combine faith with politics and was criticized for disrespecting the non secular sentiments of the folks of Odisha.

Navneet Rana’s Risk to Akbaruddin Owaisi

BJP chief Navneet Rana sparked controversy by referencing a provocative assertion from AIMIM chief Akbaruddin Owaisi, who had allegedly warned “100 crore Hindus” in 2013 that his neighborhood would present what it may do if the police have been withdrawn for simply quarter-hour. In response, Rana threatened that it will take simply 15 seconds for Hindus to react. Her remark was extensively seen as an incitement to violence and was condemned by many for escalating communal tensions.

Mamata Banerjee on “Voter Fraud” Allegations

West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee stirred up controversy when she alleged large-scale voter fraud in her state, claiming that the BJP was attempting to govern election outcomes by way of unlawful means. Her accusations have been strongly criticized by her political opponents, who considered them as an try and discredit the electoral course of and undermine democracy.

Shashi Tharoor on ‘Hindu Taliban’

Congress chief Shashi Tharoor discovered himself embroiled in controversy after likening the ruling authorities in India to a “Hindu Taliban.” His remarks, made within the context of rising non secular intolerance, have been extensively condemned for stoking communal discord. Tharoor later clarified that his remark was geared toward emphasizing the menace to India’s secular cloth, nevertheless it nonetheless ignited heated debates.

Arvind Kejriwal’s ‘Dictatorship’ Allegation

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal accused the central authorities of fostering a “dictatorship” in India, notably criticising the curbing of state powers and the bypassing of elected state governments. His remarks have been seen by many as an assault on the ruling celebration and have been perceived as undermining India’s democratic establishments.

Mayawati’s Caste-Based mostly Reservation Criticism

Bahujan Samaj Social gathering (BSP) chief Mayawati triggered a heated debate when she advised that caste-based reservations had misplaced their relevance and have been contributing to divisions in society. This remark was met with sturdy reactions, with critics accusing her of undermining affirmative motion and questioning her dedication to the reason for social justice for marginalized communities.

Rahul Gandhi’s Non secular Freedom Remark within the US

Rahul Gandhi confronted backlash after making factually incorrect statements concerning the non secular freedom of minorities in India whereas talking at an occasion in Herndon, Virginia. Gandhi claimed that in India, Sikhs weren’t allowed to put on turbans, carry kara (metal bangle), or go to gurdwaras. This remark was met with criticism from each the BJP and the Sikh neighborhood, who argued that these practices have been freely adopted in India. The neighborhood additionally identified that the one main menace to Sikh identification in India had occurred in 1984, through the anti-Sikh riots when Congress was in energy.





Source link

Leave a Comment